Integrity front and centre at first all-candidates meeting
Coulter points to government's achievements
By Bruce Urquhart - Politics Reporter
WOODSTOCK - The sponsorship scandal and the issue of government
integrity were front and centre at last night's all-candidates meeting
at Goff Hall.
While asking Conservative candidate Dave MacKenzie what he would do
to prevent government corruption, one audience member said the people of
Canada have lost faith in the honesty and integrity of their elected
officials.
"I don't believe (corruption) is systemic," said MacKenzie,
"and I don't think it's gone on forever. It's been a problem for
the last 10 years.
"We have to elect honest people to start with, and then put the
process in place - the checks and balances - that need to be
there."
When asked if Prime Minister Paul Martin was responsible for the
sponsorship scandal, MacKenzie said it didn't matter what he believed.
"Canadians do (think he's responsible)," he said.
"People are talking about honesty, integrity, corruption and
scandal. It's not necessarily about change but changing the people who
are there."
The other six non-Liberal candidates at the meeting also denounced
the Liberal government for the scandals of the last decade. Zoé
Kunschner, Oxford's NDP candidate, stated her party's commitment to
"restore integrity and accountability in government" while
Leslie Bartley, the Christian Heritage hopeful, decried the
"Liberal atmosphere of corruption."
Murray Coulter, Oxford's Liberal candidate, said people need to stop
talking in "generalities about scandals" but admitted that the
Liberal government had made mistakes. Discussing the two major scandals
of the Liberal administration, he described the Human Resources and
Development "boondoggle," which involved the mismanagement of
public money in the Transitional Jobs Fund, as unforgivable.
"I don't understand to this day why proper (financial) records
weren't kept," he said.
Coulter called the $100-million sponsorship scandal as a federal
program delivered inefficiently but said "we learn from our
mistakes."
Coulter highlighted his party's successes over the past 10 years,
applauding the Liberal's fiscal and social policies.
"It's a record that will be difficult to match by future
governments," he said.
While government accountability was one of the most discussed topics
of the evening, the more than 200 people in the audience heard the
candidates' views on a variety of issues, ranging from the economy to
abortion.
All eight candidates promised their party would provide a balanced
budget despite commitments to increased spending in other areas. Coulter
stressed the Liberal party's success in tabling seven consecutive
balanced budgets during its past mandates.
"We just look at the record," he said. "The balanced
budget is one of the pillars of the Liberal platform."
During his opening remarks, Coulter also mentioned his party's
success in decreasing the unemployment rate by almost four per cent
during the past decade.
MacKenzie emphasized the Conservative pledge of a balanced budget
while criticizing Martin and the Liberals for taking too much credit for
their fiscal record.
MacKenzie said the two biggest boosts to the Canadian economy - and a
partial reason for the Liberal balanced budgets - were the North
American Free Trade Agreement and the GST, two initiatives of the former
Progressive Conservative party. He also criticized the Liberal
government for cuts to provincial transfer payments, which he said
helped balance the books.
"But they wasted over $7 billion in money over that time from
the gun registry to the HRDC boondoggle to the money that has gone
missing in Quebec," said MacKenzie.
Kunschner said the NDP is fully committed to five years of balanced
budgets, saying it would shift its priorities instead of raising taxes.
The Green Party candidate, Irene Tietz, said her party would lower
taxes on income, profit and investment while increasing taxes on
pollution and inefficiency.
During the public question period of the all-candidates meeting, the
bulk of the inquiries were directed at the three major party candidates.
MacKenzie was forced to deal with a couple of social issues that have
made recent headlines, reiterating his party does not have an official
policy on abortion. When questioned about same-sex marriage, though, the
Conservative candidate was more forthcoming.
"I'm opposed to it on the traditional grounds that (marriage) is
the union between one man and one woman," said MacKenzie.
Other questions involved health care, military spending, the
possibility of a minority government and affordable housing.
The meeting, which was sponsored by the Woodstock District Chamber of
Commerce and the Woodstock, Ingersoll and District Real Estate Board,
will be broadcast by Rogers on June 10 at 3 p.m. and 10:30 p.m. The
meeting will then be rebroadcast at the same times, starting June 14 and
running until the June 28 election.